The current passage of the US GENIUS Act was broadly celebrated as a significant step ahead for stablecoin adoption, however a key provision might curb the attraction of digital {dollars} in comparison with cash market funds, elevating questions on whether or not the invoice’s authors had been swayed by banking trade stress to limit yield-bearing stablecoins.
The GENIUS Act expressly bans issuers from providing yield-bearing stablecoins, successfully stopping each retail and institutional buyers from incomes curiosity on their digital greenback holdings.
Due to this, Temujin Louie, CEO of crosschain interoperability protocol Wanchain, cautioned towards viewing the laws as an unqualified win for the trade.
“In a vacuum, this can be true,” Louie advised Cointelegraph. “However by explicitly prohibiting stablecoin issuers from providing yield, the GENIUS Act truly protects a significant benefit of cash market funds.”
As Cointelegraph reported, cash market funds, or MMFs, are rising as Wall Avenue’s reply to stablecoins, significantly when issued in tokenized kind. JPMorgan strategist Teresa Ho famous that tokenized MMFs may unlock new use instances, resembling serving as margin collateral.
Louie agrees, claiming that “tokenization allows cash market funds to undertake the pace and adaptability that beforehand made stablecoins distinctive, with out sacrificing security and regulatory oversight.”
Paul Brody, world blockchain chief at EY, advised Cointelegraph that tokenized MMFs and tokenized deposits “may discover a vital new alternative onchain,” particularly within the absence of yield on stablecoin holdings.
“Cash market funds can function and look lots like stablecoins to end-users, however with the distinction that they do supply yield,” Brody stated.
In accordance with EY’s Brody, the supply of yield might be a deciding issue between tokenized MMFs and stablecoins. Nonetheless, he famous that stablecoins retain sure benefits:
“Stablecoins are allowed as bearer belongings, which suggests they will simply be put into DeFi providers and different onchain monetary providers with out sophisticated administration of entry and switch controls. If tokenized cash market funds have many restrictions that stop such utilization, it’s attainable the attraction of yield may not be sufficient to offset the added operational issues.”
Associated: Crypto execs center stage as Trump signs stablecoin bill into law
The banking trade’s grip on the stablecoin debate
The GENIUS Act’s prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins got here as little shock, with Cointelegraph previously reporting that the banking foyer seems to have exerted vital affect over the continuing coverage debate round stablecoins.
Again in Could, NYU professor and blockchain guide Austin Campbell cited sources inside the banking trade, revealing that monetary establishments are actively lobbying to dam interest-bearing stablecoins to guard their long-standing enterprise mannequin.
After many years of providing depositors minimal curiosity, banks feared their competitiveness can be threatened if stablecoin issuers had been allowed to supply yield on to holders, Campbell stated.
Nonetheless, yield-bearing digital belongings do exist within the US, albeit underneath the obvious purview of securities regulation. In February, the Securities and Trade Fee permitted the nation’s first yield-bearing stablecoin security, issued by Determine Markets. The token, known as YLDS, supplied a 3.85% yield at launch.
Associated: GENIUS sets new stablecoin rules but remains vague on foreign issuers