Galaxy Digital moved quickly to push back on a narrative that a massive Bitcoin trade it handled was driven by fears about quantum computers.
Reports say the massive trade happened, but the firm’s researchers made it clear that the motive was not a sudden technological panic.
Galaxy Denies Quantum Motive
According to Alex Thorn, Galaxy’s head of research, the trade—executed on behalf of a wealthy client—was not about Bitcoin’s resistance to future quantum attacks.
The firm released its quarterly figures at the same time, showing a net loss of $482 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and a $241 million loss for 2025 overall.
Those numbers, paired with the large trade, fed a rumor that rippled through crypto channels and social feeds.
Hooo buddy. To translate what @novogratz is saying here (via $GLXY earnings call this AM): The $9B block trade Galaxy did last quarter was for someone 1) early/rich (clearly), 2) smart, 3) fairly concerned about $BTC Quantum Resistance https://t.co/kooKJyjB1s pic.twitter.com/iUsu1pvM17
— Kellan Grenier (@kellangrenier) February 3, 2026
Market Timing And Headlines
Bitcoin briefly slipped below $75,000 around the same time, and that price move magnified chatter. Some people connected the whale sell-off to an emerging tech threat.
Reports say a handful of market commentators pointed to quantum computing as the reason for the sell. But many experts pushed back, arguing that the timeline for a quantum machine capable of breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography is long.
quantum is not why the whale sold
novo didn’t connect the two. he said it was one reason ppl are claiming for btc weakness, but he disagrees with that (this is clear if you read the full transcript)
he then clarified on bloomberg that quantum isn’t the reason for btc weakness https://t.co/pxvqOvsTZZ pic.twitter.com/JT5Qi0PXI4
— Alex Thorn (@intangiblecoins) February 3, 2026
Adam Back, a long-standing voice in the space, has argued that a meaningful quantum threat is decades away, not a near-term event.
Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum co-founder, agreed that blockchains could adopt stronger signatures well before any widespread risk materializes.
Andreas Antonopoulos, a well-known Bitcoin educator and author, has emphasized that if quantum computers ever became that powerful, many global systems would already be affected, not only crypto.
BIP-360 And The Community Response
A defensive step has emerged inside the ecosystem: supporters and some fund managers have been promoting BIP-360, a proposal that would add a post-quantum signature option for vulnerable Bitcoin addresses.
Reports note that such measures reflect planning, not panic. They show that developers and stakeholders are discussing options and preparing possible upgrades. That planning is part of normal risk management in a system that values longevity.
Trading Reasons Can Be Mixed
Large holders sell for many motives: tax planning, portfolio rebalancing, liquidity needs, or strategic hedging. It is rare for a single rationale—especially a speculative technology fear—to explain a trade of this size without other corroborating signals.
The denial from Galaxy makes the quantum angle look like a post-hoc story that filled a gap in an already jittery market.
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
